Ancient Peaks, Zinfandel, Santa Margarita Ranch
Ancient Peaks · California › Santa Margarita Ranch › United States of America
Critics Average score from professional wine critics and publications.
88
/100
Reviews
16
professional
Vintages
No vintages
NV
Community Reviews
2020
Reviews
87.6
Avg Score
91
Highest
Taster #8806
· May 2, 2018
90/100
Well balanced and more earthy than the typical fruit bomb zin's.
2014 vintage
Taster #7485
· Mar 22, 2018
85/100
Cranberries. Fell off within a few hours of opening.
2014 vintage
Taster #4366
· Feb 7, 2018
Very good! Bought at Fine Wine and Tastings on Main LWR.
2014 vintage
Taster #0227
· Jan 22, 2018
83/100
Over-extracted, tastes of oak and high alcohol - much higher than the 14.5% listed on bottle. Underlying that, there's some good zin brambly fruit, persistent strawberry, strawberry jam, decent acid, and some cinnamon and black pepper. A persistent finish that I find totally dry... not the worst zin as there's some good fruit underlying, but would be better with a lighter touch.
2014 vintage
Taster #2364
· Apr 30, 2017
90/100
Very nice but has to be drunk on the cool side at 60-62. Was great then but as it came up to room temp (69) started to get to sweet.
2014 vintage
Taster #3807
· Apr 2, 2017
89/100
Medium-dark color. Jammy but slightly green berry notes. Maybe some gooseberry in there. Easily drinkable, with enough acidity to make it interesting. Good with food.
2014 vintage
Taster #3846
· Mar 22, 2017
85/100
Overly sweet with a dull muted aftertaste. some may like this style. It's not for me.
2014 vintage
Taster #5276
· Feb 11, 2017
87/100
In a good way, this is a single purpose Zinfandel. It only exists to bring us upfront, over the top, juicy, plum, blackberry, blueberry, cherry and some red fruit goodness. As someone who has attended ZAP 9 times, really appreciate to taste one of these every once in a while. Typical dark purple but not opaque color. Just enough acid, tannins and American oak to keep things balanced and interesting.
2014 vintage
Taster #5087
· Jan 14, 2017
83/100
Clearly shows the Paso Robles terroir, and an excellent value. Almost, but not quite, too jammy after breathing for a bit. After a day under gas it became even sweeter, so I dumped the remainder.
2014 vintage
Taster #0075
· Jan 3, 2013
88/100
I am a Lodi fan, like the jammy taste. Not jammy but little peppery which i like and finishes a little dry. My wife says she tastes the nutmeg, hmmm For the right price point 14 or so would buy.
2009 vintage
Taster #0300
· Nov 27, 2012
Restrained, with good balance; drink up
2009 vintage
Taster #6132
· Jun 2, 2012
88/100
A very tasty QPR Zin. Drinks very nice- a little heavy on the oak (noticeable)- but good spice and fruit. Well done for ~$13
2009 vintage
Taster #0300
· Apr 21, 2012
Some prune going on, and a touch too Paso-like for my tastes, but overall this is a totally drinkable quaffer on the more restrained side. At $15, wouldn't buy again
2009 vintage
Taster #6028
· Apr 19, 2012
88/100
Decanted about 2 hrs. ahead. Deep ruby with a bit of orange at the edge. Nice nose of plums, cassis, graphite, with nutmeg notes, toward the cooked end of the scale. Rich yet friendly on the palate, as acids are not soft but not firm either. Flavors add in some cooked-fruit, pruney notes along with earth tones. Finishes quickly with low grip and light tannins. This is a very drinkable zin. It's friendly and a bit rich, but it doesn't …
2009 vintage
Taster #3846
· Apr 8, 2012
91/100
Yes, As others have said "juicy", very juicy! Nice taninns too boot. For the price (12.99) this is a special Zin....Won't age for long , but very drinkable now and maybe for a year or two. You will not be embarrass to pour this wine at your best summer barbeque.
2009 vintage
Taster #0300
· Mar 14, 2012
Ma che c'e? A zin from near Paso that's restrained, structured, and somewhat elegant? No jam, no over-extraction. Above completely drinkable, nearing tasty.
2009 vintage
Taster #3388
· Feb 29, 2012
90/100
Juicy raspberry and blueberry on the nose, follows thru on the palate, medium finish, good acidity. At the price point,about $14.99, a remarkable value.
2009 vintage
Taster #2546
· Jan 28, 2012
88/100
2012 ZAP: Grand Tasting and K&L Tasting; 1/20/2012-1/28/2012 (The Concourse, San Francisco, and K&L, Redwood City, California) : Tar, herbal nose; tar, black fruit, anise palate; medium-plus finish
2009 vintage
Taster #1106
· Jan 3, 2012
86/100
Big fruit on the nose, spicy on the palate. Fairly simple, and a little out of balance.
2009 vintage
Taster #9066
· Nov 23, 2011
90/100
11/23/11 - I wish I still had one of the '08's to do a direct comparison, but without that I'd say the this vintage shares the same characteristics. A very nice wine. I bought 4 bottles this time...need to buy more!
2009 vintage