Talley, Rincon Chardonnay, Central Coast

Talley · California Central Coast United States of America

White · Chardonnay
Critics Average score from professional wine critics and publications.
90 /100
Reviews
19
professional

Vintages

No vintages

No vintage-specific entries have been added for this wine.

NV

Community Reviews

20
20
Reviews
90.4
Avg Score
93
Highest
Taster #5738 · Oct 18, 2014
93/100
A quite nice final bottle, nine years in. For sure a bit aged, but all in a very good way.
2005 vintage
Taster #8676 · Jun 30, 2014
90/100
Medium-deep brassy yellow in color. Forward, attractive, developed and complex nose of mature ripe fruit aromas of apples & pears, some citrus notes of lemons/limes & grapefruit with floral notes of honeysuckle, butterscotch/caramel/toffee ovetones, spices, some minerals, wet stones & flintiness with a touch of vanilla in the background. Medium-full bodied with a good concentration of mature & developed, viscous, balanced, complex, smooth textured, mature, ripe flavors of green apples, lemons and limes with toasted oak, butterscotch, spices, minerals and …
2005 vintage
Taster #5738 · Feb 10, 2012
92/100
Peaked at 93 almost exactly a year ago? The notes are still the same, but the overall picture is now tinged with a bit of age - nice if you like it. I don't dislike it per se, but I do find it a bit distracting from the wildly fabulous picture of last year. Nonetheless, still very very good. 1 bottle to go! And oh yes, still better with 45 minutes of air on it.
2005 vintage
Taster #5738 · Feb 19, 2011
93/100
Something about this Rincon chardonnay makes it more than the sum of its parts. It's a very, very good Rincon chardonnay. It's not overtly fruity, and it's not overtly showy with an extravagent nose, but the fruit is good (and dark and minerally and slightly tropical) and the nose is very good, and the mouth, well, the feel in the mouth is of pure, lit liquid that just makes it come together. Seems to get better and better - wish …
2005 vintage
Taster #5738 · Dec 4, 2010
Seems to get better and better, I guess. Better than the 2006 from last night and the 2007 from earlier this evening - though the 2007 seems built - and has the stuffing to crow about. Nice fruit, with
2005 vintage
Taster #2983 · May 1, 2010
91/100
Interesting wine; light gold colour; slightly vegetal nose with asparagus and cooked peppers but bolstered by peaches, honey and a very slight floral quality. Well balanced and interesting. Somewhere midway between California fruity opulance and Burgundy vegetal austerity. Certainly not the best I've had but very interesting and enjoyable...what more can you really ask for.
2005 vintage
Taster #5738 · Nov 20, 2009
92/100
Well, I don't know about opinions being "locked in," as it seems that this bottling is getting better with each passing month. Chalkier, stonier, nosier, longer. More orange fruit in the background. I find this wine to be so full that the oak is undetectable, though I think that the texture belies its existence. Perhaps 4 years of age is right for this bottling, though this one shows no sign of degradation.
2005 vintage
Taster #5738 · Oct 14, 2009
91/100
Seems to have come out of its shell in 4 months. Amazing? Coincidence? Bottle variation? Full throttled here - big nose of dark white tropical fruit; intense, riviting mouth that gripped my mouth; length is nice for a bit, then clipped. Not a spectacular bottle of "wine", but right now, it shows quite well, especially for its pedigree. And, it's very, very easy to drink.
2005 vintage
Taster #6617 · Aug 6, 2009
90/100
Tanish golden color. My note from 9 months ago mentioned alcohol but that seems to have resolved. Still a full bodied bold chardonnay, with ripe apples and pineapples offsetting vanilla toasty oak. Full and lush, not crisp. Matched with the right food.....
2005 vintage
Taster #5738 · Jun 19, 2009
90/100
Burgundian, tart, refreshing, needs time to come out of a shell.
2005 vintage
Taster #5738 · May 15, 2009
89/100
Somewhat reticent nose, slightly oaky, orange fruit that could be better for this bottling. Length is the best part of the wine - citric, focused, and interesting - saves the wine from being just average. Quite a difference between this wine and the Rosemary's.
2005 vintage
Taster #3046 · Jan 31, 2009
88/100
my opinion of this wine is locked in.
2005 vintage
Taster #3046 · Jan 11, 2009
88/100
big lemon note tonight. consistent oak.
2005 vintage
Taster #3046 · Dec 16, 2008
89/100
much better performance tonight. still too full of oak, but less aggravating and higher acid.
2005 vintage
Taster #3046 · Nov 18, 2008
87/100
too much oak, too little acid, and very average complexity, i.e. lacking. a disappointment.
2005 vintage
Taster #6617 · Nov 4, 2008
90/100
Darker yellow with full nose showing a touch of the 14.5% alcohol. Plenty of toasty oak but well balanced with a solid core of ripe apples and pears for balance. Long full finish. Not a laid back wine.
2005 vintage
Taster #2629 · May 30, 2008
91/100
Beautiful aromas spill into luscious flavanoids that usher abundant complexities that ring out loud. I savor the segue from aroma to palate. Succulent vanilla toast and tropicals with a mild acid disposition. I really like the aroma to flavor transition. This is a classic specimen for balance. Beautiful!
2005 vintage
Taster #5395 · Dec 25, 2007
92/100
medium body, good floral notes, complex white fruit, stoney finish, very nice.
2005 vintage
Taster #5738 · Oct 21, 2007
90/100
2005 Chardonnay's; 1/1/2007-12/31/2008 : Unlike the 2005 Rosemary's wine, this bottling is rather unfocused - good, but a bit on the shelly, mushy side. There's ample amounts of crushed, chalky stone and ripe white fruit in the mouth, a decent, rather unfocused nose. The length is minerally, if a bit on the short side for this wine. Seems like the other side of the coin from the Rosemary's bottling.
2005 vintage
Taster #7780 · Jun 23, 2007
91/100
Winery: Minerals, lite peach pear notes; grt natural freshness, silky lite mth, more subdued, earthier notes, dry on palate.
2005 vintage