Behrens & Hitchcock, Petite Sirah, Spring Mountain District
Behrens & Hitchcock · California › Spring Mountain District › United States of America
Critics Average score from professional wine critics and publications.
90
/100
Reviews
18
professional
Vintages
No vintages
NV
Community Reviews
2121
Reviews
90.3
Avg Score
93
Highest
Taster #2654
· Dec 30, 2015
Flawed Of the many Behrens & Hitchcock wines I have had, this is the 1st one to be undrinkable. That said, I don't believe it was the synthetic cork.
2002 vintage
Taster #8101
· Jul 5, 2014
84/100
Flabby, heavy fruits, would decant for an hour
2002 vintage
Taster #8269
· Jun 23, 2014
93/100
This is a real blockbuster Petite Sirah!
2006 vintage
Taster #2309
· Jun 9, 2014
88/100
Very heavy body. Has plenty of big, highly concentrated fruit left, although the flavors are more savory at this point, with just a touch of blue/black fruit notes. Dark, chewy, charcoal like tannins on the back end but not much acidity, so it seems a little flabby. Still doesn't seem quite integrated. Perhaps the synthetic cork prevents a more typical aging profile. Not sure if it will get better with more time.
2002 vintage
Taster #0918
· Oct 12, 2012
93/100
Initial port like quality... then it opens up to a gorgeous bottle of wine. Really quite evolved!
2002 vintage
Taster #5533
· Aug 30, 2012
92/100
RICH BERRY FRUIT IN THE NOSE AND FLAVOR WITH CHOCOLATE, CHERRIES, AND A TOUCH OF SPICE. NICE COMPLEXITY AND A LONG FINISH.
2002 vintage
Taster #4230
· Mar 10, 2012
90/100
Slow o'ed for four hours. Brought this as a fun mystery wine to a wine dinner and it was matched up against a 2001 Cali Cab and a 2003 Tuscan. Having never had a B&H PS I wasn't expecting much, especially once I took the capsule off and saw the purple synthetic cork, but this wine was pretty solid. Midnight dark and coated the sides of the glass. Dark fruits and the alcohol was well integrated. Several guessed Zinfandel or …
2002 vintage
Taster #0975
· Feb 19, 2012
92/100
Sampled 2/17/12. Decanted 2 hours, and it needed 4. Hate the purple rubber stopper as it's ability to hold a seal is questionable and each bottle is a crap shoot, but this bottle was still very young and the rubber did its job well. Inky purple color with a huge nose and body as you'd expect. Nice subtle layers of overripe black fruits and currant, some sweet Oak, a little underbrush and hints of dried herbs. Very smooth, with a …
2002 vintage
Taster #0728
· Nov 13, 2010
Less than an hour of decant. Matched against 02 Quilceda. Wife enjoyed very much. A bold high octane wine. Not for the faint of heart.
2002 vintage
Taster #5733
· Oct 18, 2009
91/100
Opened but not decanted, and allowed to sit for 2 hours. A bit more graphite than I personally like, but well-balanced and drinking well. Solid through 2012+ and likely in its prime drinking window.
2002 vintage
Taster #1279
· May 18, 2009
90/100
sealed with a plastic cork: Perhaps a bit more advanced than the last bottle....straightforward but pleasantly fruity nose...fairly resolved tannins, medium plus finish. I prefer to let petites age longer than this, but a dead 2000 a few months ago (sealed with plastic cork) prompted me to drink sooner rather than later.
2002 vintage
Taster #1279
· Feb 26, 2009
92/100
popped and poured,....bottle sealed with plastic cork,but it didn't present the accelerated aging a recent bottle of the 2000 exhibited. dark fruits...full bodied..nice mouthfeel.....lingering finish..tannins present but balanced...after a couple hours, the tannins did come to the fore
2002 vintage
Taster #0905
· Jan 20, 2009
92/100
I really liked this one. While there is still a little volatility on the nose, the palate is just fantastic. Rich and velvety with black and blue fruit notes and underlying meineral and chocolate tones. Just gorgeous in the mouth. Can pair well with food now. This would be a good time to drink more of these.
2002 vintage
Taster #5733
· Jul 12, 2008
89/100
Black ink, muted fruit aromas. Not a bad wine, but one-dimensional. I typically look for layers of flavors in B&H syrahs, and this was a bit of letdown
2002 vintage
Taster #9742
· Apr 11, 2008
90/100
Drinking pretty well now. Very dark color, and surprisingly well balanced, but I didn't get all the zip that other folks have mentioned.
2002 vintage
Taster #8081
· Feb 28, 2008
88/100
Inky dark purple. Big alcohol shows through, but the fruit profile and balance is otherwise pretty good. Served on the cool side, this is not bad, but not exactly my cup of tea either.
2002 vintage
Taster #6357
· May 29, 2006
Tannic. A little closed but blackberry, nicely balanced
2002 vintage
Taster #9463
· Mar 25, 2006
90/100
Whoa! Inky black, really dark inky black. The nose on this is a little tight, but there's some fruit in there somewhere. I love the silky mouth feel of this wine. The high alcohol is certainly noticeable, but there's enough fruit to keep it mostly in check. The tannins are smooth and plentiful. Loads of black fruit with a dab of chocolate and a nice zip of pepper. A huge wine that's certainly not for everyone, it was good to …
2002 vintage
Taster #7697
· Dec 21, 2005
92/100
Tasted with new Agency team. Excellent petite.
2002 vintage
Taster #7697
· Apr 3, 2005
90/100
This wine was a monster! Decanted for about 8 hours prior to tasting, and then poured back into the bottle. Very, very dark color. A bit hot on the palate, but very fruit forward. I realize I committed infanticide on this one, but just couldn't resist. Glad I still have one more.
2002 vintage
Taster #5317
· Jul 18, 2004
89/100
Seattle Tasting Group does 'BBQ Reds' (Issaquah, WA, USA) : This wine is pitch black. On the nose I find heat but little else with some faint notes of blueberry eventually sneaking out. Wow, the palate provides and explosion of blackberry with huge structure. This is grippy and juicy.
2002 vintage