Archery Summit, Pinot Noir Arcus Estate, Dundee Hills

Archery Summit · Oregon Dundee Hills United States of America

Red · Pinot Noir
Critics Average score from professional wine critics and publications.
90 /100
Reviews
130
professional

Vintages

No vintages

No vintage-specific entries have been added for this wine.

NV

Community Reviews

156
156
Reviews
90.1
Avg Score
98
Highest
Taster #8506 · Oct 18, 2024
94/100
Out of magnum. The score improved over the time it was opened to when it was finished. 3 hrs. Deep color, good fruit and weight on the palate. Has time on its side.
2009 vintage
Taster #4443 · Jul 31, 2024
87/100
This was never a great wine, but cellar time has been kind here, with the roasted fruit softened and enough structure still well in place.
2003 vintage
Taster #5416 · Oct 20, 2023
90/100
Wine Palooza (Eagan, MN) : For sure past prime but very drinkable. Light wine with minerals, spice floral and earth. Short to medium finish.
1999 vintage
Taster #9264 · Sep 13, 2023
So I bought a cellar; 11/12/2022-12/31/2030 : Brought to an Oregon Pinot themed dinner. Beautiful color. Rough nose at first, but opens up after a bit. Compared to some of the other Oregon Pinots on the table - especially the 2013 Eyries, this one was a bit dark and dense. But not overwhelming or overly fruity. It had the spice and savory character of a burgundy, but the freshness and fruit of an American wine. I don’t know my Oregon …
2009 vintage
Taster #5317 · Jul 28, 2023
IPNC; 7/26/2023-7/30/2023 (McMinnville, Oregon) : Very oaky but delicious.
2009 vintage
Taster #7456 · Apr 6, 2023
90/100
Opened and poured. Medium body, some very slight barny notes blew off quickly....rose petals on the nose. Nice acidity, cherry and hints of plums and strawberry. Still drinking well on day two plus....the best bottle of this so far.
1999 vintage
Taster #3280 · Feb 19, 2023
Same as the earlier bottle.
2002 vintage
Taster #3280 · Feb 4, 2023
90/100
Not perfect, but oh so good.
2002 vintage
Taster #4443 · Apr 25, 2022
Just slightly corked. Moderately tired underneath.
2003 vintage
Taster #4059 · Jan 13, 2022
90/100
Purple in color with very slight bricking. Nose of candied cherry and a little blueberry. Opens with notes of dark cherry with floral notes and some earthiness on the back end. A heavier style. If tasted blind, I probably would have guessed RRV and not Oregon. 13.5% ABV. Tannins are integrated and the wine has decent acid balance. Would have thought this was much younger. Even the cork was pristine, popping out like a recently released bottle without crumbling at …
1999 vintage
Taster #4443 · Dec 20, 2021
88/100
Still lots of powerful black fruit with good+ concentration, just ultra modern with a pronounced amount of new oak, so not quite perfectly balanced.
2002 vintage
Taster #6595 · Aug 15, 2021
This was one of the two Archery Summits that I was moved to take from the cellar on the basis of an alarming tasting note. I wouldn't entirely disagree with that note's conclusion that it was past its prime. Did it deserve that low of a score? I don't score but I would not go that low. Age apparent in the brickish red color, somewhat spicy aroma, a bit of a toasted note on the palate, not so much ripe …
2004 vintage
Taster #3923 · Jul 30, 2021
80/100
This faded fast since a bottle few months ago (as I feared it might). Faint berry nose. Strawberry fruit, sharp spice, bit of heat on the palate. Fine tannins, bit hard acidity, out of balance. Finishes long, hard and red fruited. Past prime.
2004 vintage
Taster #6508 · Jul 18, 2021
Purchase again
2003 vintage
Taster #3923 · Feb 13, 2021
84/100
Dark red at the core with translucent cherry at the edges. Savory nose, bit of cherry. The palate has strawberry, cherry liqueur, bit of spice. Slightly hot (14.3% ABV). Fine tannins, nice acidity, fair balance. Finishes moderately long with spice and red fruits. Again, a bit of heat on the finish. Not bad at this point, but I'd drink up.
2004 vintage
Taster #3273 · Sep 19, 2020
85/100
Too old
2003 vintage
Taster #8522 · May 15, 2020
92/100
Clean, no sediment. Slightly bricking in color. Sweet cherry, rhubarb and a bit of pine jump from glass. Medium weight, with bright cherry, red licorice, heather and sweet cola notes fading to slightly acidic finish. This wine is at a good spot, so drink now.
2009 vintage
Taster #3739 · Feb 28, 2020
90/100
Did not decant. Mild acidity remained as did quite a bit of fruit (darker ripe fruit, currant and raisin). Very enjoyable even at 12 yrs old.
2007 vintage
Taster #8821 · May 23, 2019
Old
2003 vintage
Taster #6505 · Dec 23, 2018
93/100
Drank over two nights. Bought at the winery. Ruby red colored, medium bodied. strong cherry nose, cotton candy, red licorice. Good acidity. Well balanced. Lots of red berries. Medium finish. Great structure. Very sophisticated wine. The winery is a nice place to visit as well. All around this is one classy wine. Fantastic! Magnums are better!!
2009 vintage
Taster #8506 · Nov 24, 2018
91/100
Deep dark color, good nose, good palate feel and good finish. All around good.
2009 vintage
Taster #4443 · Nov 15, 2018
88/100
Big black and blue berries, nicely mature with good weight. New oak still seems overt. Purchased from AS directly upon release, stored properly since.
1999 vintage
Taster #8506 · Aug 8, 2018
93/100
Consistent notes from prior btls tasted. Loved the depth, tons of tannins. Off year but after 15'years, this wine still has life! Loved it. Buy.
2003 vintage
Taster #9678 · Jul 29, 2018
91/100
Held up remarkably well as a Magnum. A crowd favorite at a wine party we attended last night.
2003 vintage
Taster #4285 · Jun 1, 2018
85/100
Average in every way. Nothing bad. Nothing great.
1999 vintage
Taster #0396 · May 4, 2018
Friday Tasting Group; Unthemed (Vintage Wines Ltd., San Diego, CA) : Aged 10 mos in FR oak barrels, bottled in December 2004. N: RIPE, smoky, poss jammy? P: MF, poss Med, body; NICE, ALMOST swtish frt fairly quickly met by an ALMOST swtish astringency which transitions into a LONG (although very, VERY slightly faint) finish with a DISTINCT swtness to the very, VERY fine tannins. Not sure WHAT to make of this wine, + I doubt any further improvement. [In …
2003 vintage
Taster #8506 · Jan 30, 2018
94/100
Deep fruit color, good nose, palate was electric with dark fruit, lovely on the palate, good length and lasting. Great example of Oregon aged Pinot.
2003 vintage
Taster #6769 · Dec 16, 2017
Unfortunately this did not wow me the way I was hoping. I drank it over several days, it was the best on Day 2. However, this was not stored perfectly by me in the first two years after I purchased it.
2009 vintage
Taster #1617 · Dec 3, 2017
93/100
This wine has evolved and matured beautifully!
2007 vintage
Taster #1624 · Oct 22, 2017
92/100
Really drinking well with strawberries and raspberries, finishes with some earth.
2007 vintage
Taster #1624 · Oct 1, 2017
93/100
In a great place. Strawberries, raspberries and cherries. Finishes with some mint and eucalyptus.
2007 vintage
Taster #4943 · Sep 17, 2017
97/100
Almost perfect - decanted for 30 minutes and everyone enjoyed it thoroughly. Will be good for another 3-4 years in my estimation.
2009 vintage
Taster #3280 · May 24, 2017
92/100
Ready to drink but if you have from a cold cellar it will last a few more years. Not at all tired, no donut holes, round and full fruited, earthy and luscious. Bought on release from the winery and kept in cold cellar, thank you very much! Glad i have more!!
2004 vintage
Taster #4943 · Jan 15, 2017
92/100
Still holding up well, expressed some muted berry flavors and a little funkiness. Great wine, but you get what you pay for in terms of the QPR.
2007 vintage
Taster #4443 · Nov 24, 2016
87/100
Ripe black fruit on nose and palate with good concentration. Liqueur hints. New oak notes remain. Very fun start, slightly hollow middle, then slightly tired finish.
2004 vintage
Taster #2684 · Sep 17, 2016
PNP. Has some decent fruit and smokey bacon fat. Modest acidity relative to the vintage. A little boozey, and hot, probably won't improve for more than a year or two. By all means not worth the price.
2007 vintage
Taster #4943 · Jul 30, 2016
98/100
Arcus is at peak right now. The fruit is just muted enough to let the spice come into balance. Drink now.
2009 vintage
Taster #7848 · Jun 6, 2016
Very good, not sure it will get better.
2007 vintage
Taster #3755 · May 13, 2016
Served with Mr. B's Barbeque Shrimp. rich taste of wine held up and complimented. The rich sauce.
2004 vintage
Taster #4443 · Nov 23, 2015
89/100
Lots of black cherries and berries, still slightly jammy, while nicely maturing. Faint hint of liqueur. New oak spice still comes across somewhat pronounced, but it still adds a nice additional spice note. Drink up, it's already started the back nine. 1/4 of the bottle was left, corked reinserted and bottle refrigerated until 2 nights later. Wine was removed from the refrigerator for an hour before tasted agai. Much more tired than 48 hours earlier.
2004 vintage
Taster #4183 · Nov 6, 2015
92/100
Beautiful Pinot!
2009 vintage
Taster #0492 · Sep 30, 2015
93/100
Wonderfully complex Pinot with the characteristic Dundee funk. No rush on this one, give it another decade to develop.
2007 vintage
Taster #2876 · May 25, 2015
88/100
Very primary and forward red and black fruit. Some earth. The alcohol pierced the fruit and while this was fresh and vibrant it didn't have much depth.
2002 vintage
Taster #2032 · Apr 11, 2015
This was much better than I remembered the last bottle being. Nose with black raspberry, cranberry, dried rose petals, orange peel, and some savory spicy notes. The palate is nicely integrated and balanced. Definitely seems mature at this point, but is still energetic and very pleasant. Quite good overall.
2007 vintage
Taster #5026 · Mar 18, 2015
Get a light sour fruit flavor. There's this background of almost a fizziness that seems a bit odd. Wine doesn't feel totally off, but also not quite right. Still a decent wine, but for the price point, doesn't feel like it merits it. As earlier notes mentioned it's lacking a bit in complexity.
2009 vintage
Taster #2965 · Jan 23, 2015
82/100
This was ok, not great. Dark fruit and something else somewhat sharp that I couldn't place. I think it was just beyond its prime.
2003 vintage
Taster #2843 · Nov 28, 2014
95/100
especially dense for a pinot noir, very well balanced with controlled fruit, good structure, distinctive and complex--a great one.
2004 vintage
Taster #3754 · Nov 27, 2014
88/100
Drank over the course of 3 day hoping it would get better. Not bad, just unimpressive. Drinking like a Beaune village rather than a grand cru (like its price)
2007 vintage
Taster #9936 · Oct 23, 2014
90/100
Popped n poured. Best between hours 1-3. Candied cherry and floral notes. Elements are there but a bit weak on nose concentration and a bit thin in the glass. Would be better at $40, but as the fifth most expensive "09 Oregon Pinot at $90, this is underwhelming. Drink them if you've got "em; it's drinking as good as it ever will.
2009 vintage
Taster #7374 · Oct 9, 2014
89/100
Fine dinner at Ringside!!!! Wine was wonderful!
2007 vintage