Chateau de Chambrun, Lalande de Pomerol

Chateau de Chambrun · Bordeaux Lalande de Pomerol France

Red · Red Bordeaux Blend
Critics Average score from professional wine critics and publications.
88 /100
Reviews
16
professional

Vintages

No vintages

No vintage-specific entries have been added for this wine.

NV

Community Reviews

19
19
Reviews
88.2
Avg Score
91
Highest
Taster #2855 · Aug 19, 2017
88/100
AA's wedding; 8/17/2017-8/19/2017 (Fremont, CA) : Classic mature Bordeaux - Black fruit, riper and more Merlot-driven than the Reignac, slight pyrazines, brett, new oak. Sweet tobacco and tamari tertiary notes. Dry, medium body, medium plus alcohol, medium tannins - very soft and melted. Everything is here!
2000 vintage
Taster #3044 · Mar 6, 2017
90/100
not past its time yet, but I would drink this year
2000 vintage
Taster #5610 · Jul 9, 2016
89/100
Dinner at Home (Fremont, CA) : Deep ruby with minimal bricking, less than expected for age; moderately aromatic with some sandalwood, tobacco, figs prominent on the nose; palate is full bodied, fully integrated medium tannin, medium acid, balanced medium alcohol, smooth texture throughout, red fruit; medium finish. This is ready to drink and mature, but it has at least 1-2 years left. Overall a very nice bordeaux for the release price. 89
2000 vintage
Taster #0936 · Feb 9, 2016
91/100
From 750: This may be an outlier score, considering the scores given by other cellar trackers,but I beg to differ. Given the lowly appellation, this wine is really impressive. Lovely nose leads to a well balanced palate showing the coffee and chocolate notes that Merlot often exudes. Chunky perhaps, rather than elegant, and perhaps a little lacking in acidity, this wine delivers. Last bottle. Wish I had more.
2000 vintage
Taster #9286 · Nov 18, 2015
90/100
Pleasant nose with pencil shavings and dark berries. Full but not over powering tanins. Served with steak, very nuce.
2000 vintage
Taster #5610 · Aug 16, 2014
89/100
Party (Fremont, CA) : Coravin 8/16/14: I last had this 2-3 years ago and thought it needed a few years. Deep ruby color without bricking, youthful appearing; nose has some sandalwood, good density, a core of black fruits that is somewhat impenetrable; palate is full bodied, dense black fruits, fades just a tad through the midpalate, still very primary; finish is medium length. I was wrong... this needs even more time to settle in and develop more complexity. Promising components …
2000 vintage
Taster #8464 · Aug 30, 2013
75/100
PNP and drank for 2 hours. Astringent, flat, uninteresting.
2000 vintage
Taster #4017 · Aug 12, 2013
89/100
Right at the drinking window. Pretty resolved in terms of the balance of the wine just not so much in the nose, fruit or finish. A nice Monday beverage.
2000 vintage
Taster #5663 · Nov 22, 2012
88/100
Opened about 1hr, still very drinkable with years to go.
2000 vintage
Taster #6330 · May 7, 2012
aagrawal below hits it well...I had the chance to drink the other half over the next evening or 2 and progressively softer and more open with fruit...fine for what it is
2000 vintage
Taster #5610 · Dec 29, 2011
89/100
No bricking; Good black fruits, on the riper side but not over-ripe, opened up nicely with at least 30-45 minutes of air; palate is a bit too structured currently but nearly ready, nice black fruits; finish is short-moderate length. Overall very good and nearly ready, but still has 1-2 years of improvement and a few more years of plateau. Try again in 9-12 months and re-evaluate. 88-89
2000 vintage
Taster #6093 · May 25, 2010
90/100
Deep dark colour with a rich, modern flavour profile. Oak is integrated. nicely structured. Medium long. Very good
2000 vintage
Taster #4127 · Jun 11, 2009
Very modern, some tannins but pretty open, fleshy black plum and cassis, vanillin oak, big mouthfeel, sweet, heavy. I liked but didn't love, but more appropriate food might have been in order (I mainly liked as a port substitute! ) :) B
2000 vintage
Taster #3564 · Jan 5, 2009
91/100
quite funny to see that this is dreaking very weel at the time. very tipycal from the right, i think the oak just getting well integrated. fruity, juicy and balanced with a very nice structure. a good bttle. wait another 4-5 years from now, and se....
2000 vintage
Taster #6330 · Nov 5, 2008
This was very tight and never really softened, even on day 2 Hopefuly time will help
2000 vintage
Taster #6330 · Aug 14, 2006
91/100
Everyone really enjoyed even w/ just pop and pour. Not voluptuous at all but great flavors. Brooding wine. Did not try in its youth so can't comment on how it has changed
2000 vintage
Taster #2271 · Apr 1, 2006
87/100
This wine is evolving the WRONG way. It is getting a bit alcoholic, hard to really describe. A bit tight upon opening, promising nose, plums...We will have to try it again to see if it improves in a year or so..
2000 vintage
Taster #2271 · Dec 12, 2005
90/100
Very deep color, opaque, purplish. Nice nose of blums, blackberry, cassis. Nice round palate impression, chewy. Needs a couople more years.
2000 vintage
Taster #2159 · Sep 26, 2003
84/100
Tasted unblinded at the Vintage Wines, Ltd. wine bar. First bottle corked. The second bottle was clean. Opaque black/purple robe with dark purple rim. The nose shows moderately intense aromas of plum, vanilla, currants and dust, with a somewhat bothersome unripe component. Full-bodied on the palate, with big astringent tannins, big oak and high acidity. Similar flavors as for the nose, including the "green thread". Medium, dry finish. Will clearly improve with some time in the bottle, but the vegetal …
2000 vintage