Giribaldi, Barolo

Giribaldi · Piedmont › Barolo › Italy

Red · Nebbiolo
Critics Average score from professional wine critics and publications.
88 /100
Reviews
18
professional

Vintages

No vintages

No vintage-specific entries have been added for this wine.

NV

Community Reviews

24
24
Reviews
88.3
Avg Score
92
Highest
Taster #7762 · Dec 15, 2024
90/100
Slow oxed for 8 hours then into a decanter. Nose is much better that the pallet. A bit thin and sharp. Some cherry notes and just a bit of tar that are surrounded by active tannins and acids. Fair effort.
2010 vintage
Taster #2839 · Sep 23, 2023
88/100
Decanted for an hour and was ready to go. Nice fruit with some earth. Simple and enjoyable.
2013 vintage
Taster #7961 · Feb 11, 2023
91/100
Great QPR. Has years left.
2010 vintage
Taster #8214 · May 29, 2020
This wine was at its best about an hour after opening (no decant), pairing well with a big fat grilled NY strip. Seven hours later it is still very tannic but all the fruit has faded and it tastes old and tired.
2006 vintage
Taster #8734 · Feb 13, 2020
90/100
A wonderful pairing with some risotto my guests brought from their trip to Piedmont. Wine has held to beautifully. Tannins were refined, balanced acidity and a pleasant mouthfeel. Really enjoyed this wine. Drink now.
2009 vintage
Taster #5890 · Feb 13, 2020
90/100
Quite fresh and drinkable. Would expect to have another 5-10 year drinking window.
2010 vintage
Taster #0837 · May 15, 2019
Nothing earth-shattering, but a good and pleasant nebbiolo for daily drinking.
2006 vintage
Taster #8214 · May 10, 2019
High acid, tannic, and not much fruit. Something wrong here. Maybe an off bottle.
2006 vintage
Taster #0913 · Dec 18, 2018
88/100
Bright, medium-dark color. Funky nose indicative of older casks, slight bacterial spoilage and some volatility, typical of old-fashioned Barolo. Plenty of fruit in the flavor but not much tannin. A near-term drinker.
2013 vintage
Taster #3792 · Dec 11, 2018
89/100
super dry.
2010 vintage
Taster #8917 · Nov 27, 2017
91/100
Garnet in color with a ruby edge. Nose of violets, tar, and hints of cherries. Tastes of cherries, tobacco, and hint of leather. Modern style which is approachable now and drinking well. Should develop positively in the short term. Drink over the next 7 years.
2010 vintage
Taster #5750 · Jun 21, 2017
90/100
Can't believe I'm the first review... Also can't remember what I paid years back, maybe $25-ish, very reasonable. This is a very good wine that is drinking well now. We let breathe for a small bit and decanted for an hour and it opened up and drank like you hope a mature Barolo would. Lots of dark cherry and wood notes coat your tongue with the remaining tannins. Elegant, but on the full-bodied side, deserves some food-pairing: something short of …
2009 vintage
Taster #7149 · Apr 13, 2017
Meh, unremarkable. Pass.
2010 vintage
Taster #3792 · Aug 4, 2016
89/100
Very tight and dry. Mouth-puckeringly dry. I think this wine needs some serious time to mellow out and evolve.
2010 vintage
Taster #3971 · May 2, 2016
thin, acidic, flavorless - don't like
2010 vintage
Taster #7961 · Jul 1, 2015
92/100
The classical or traditional characterization of Barolo wines is one that punishes you for drinking it young and richly rewards you for drinking it old. Alternatively, a wine you have to patiently store in order to experience its greatness, which excludes an elder drinker as well as everybody who buys and drinks a wine on the same day. I did not understand how true this was until I attended a tasting of Barolos from 1961 through 1985, based on a …
2010 vintage
Taster #3792 · Apr 8, 2015
90/100
Very tight, dry and young. Has potential. Will see if a day or 2 of aeration shows its potential.
2010 vintage
Taster #0913 · Dec 28, 2014
88/100
1st tasting notes are below. In a more recent tasting I detected ethyl acetate (nail polish remover) — a big surprise. Unfortunately, this has caused me to question the wine's future. Only time will tell. 1st tasting: The 2010 Barolos are terrific and this one, while not among the upper crust, is a an excellent example. Surprisingly light in color, it enters with Barolo's typical dusty fruit in the nose, then hits your palate and explodes. The finish is long …
2010 vintage
Taster #2610 · Dec 3, 2014
80/100
like drinking fire water... NOT GOOD AT ALL.
2010 vintage
Taster #0653 · Sep 14, 2012
92/100
Solid tannins, opened up nicely after 45 minutes in a decanter. Beautiful with the red sauce accompanying our pasta dish, and a ribeye.
2004 vintage
Taster #0837 · Jun 15, 2012
87/100
Pop/pour. 20 minutes later - on the nose, rich and deep in character. Sort of a perfumed, woody, boozy combo. On the palate, this is a bit out of sorts at present, and comes across more as a bunch of individual components (fruits, acids, tannins, an odd green pepper not I'm not used to in a Barolo) as opposed to an integrated drink. Seems to be balanced enough to evolve and improve. Decent early palate, with a hint of a …
2006 vintage
Taster #7954 · May 17, 2012
89/100
Deep ruby, faint shades of mahogany in the center grading to red brick edges. Shriveled strawberry and fresh cut roses, some black cherry, dominate the nose, faint vanilla and cedar. Red raspberry joins across the palate and finish is solidly as the beginning, lingering handmade red licorice and milk chocolate with red oak. Minerality makes a big finale and only adds to the dry nature of this bottle, indicative of the varietal. While not a runaway champion of a bottle, …
2006 vintage
Taster #3247 · Jul 8, 2011
Aerated for 3 hours, followed over 2 days with consistent results. The only other review here describes the wine as tannic, dry, bitter, etc. In other words, all things Barolo/Nebbiolo -at least for those new to the grape/region. That some outfit called winepleasures, one of the internetz's myriad self-appointed wine authorities, rates this as 75 does as much harm to the wine/winery/region as it does to the notion of winepleasures being a legitimate (read: qualified) business/authority. Yes, this is ripe, …
2006 vintage
Taster #8756 · Jul 23, 2010
75/100
Licorice straight in- nicer than getting smoke/spice blasted at you. A nice orange tint which suggest good aging. A good oaky smell that's not too overpowering. A little bit of candied vanilla and cherries- like a Twizzler. Pretty tannic on the taste, a little bitter as well. High expectations created by the nose are not satisfied on the tongue- a bit disappointing.
2006 vintage