Cruse, Rorick Chardonnay, Sierra Foothills
Cruse · California › Sierra Foothills › United States of America
Critics Average score from professional wine critics and publications.
87
/100
Reviews
11
professional
Vintages
No vintages
NV
Community Reviews
1212
Reviews
87.4
Avg Score
91
Highest
Taster #6381
· May 31, 2025
90/100
Pale gold colour that is a bit cloudy. Medium and developing nose with ripe yellow apples, ripe peach, ripe lemon, charred wood, roasted hazelnuts, butter, wet chalk and wet stones. Medium taste of ripe yellow apples, ripe peach, ripe lemon, charred wood, butter, roasted hazelnuts, wet chalk and wet stone. Long and dry finish. High acidity. Medium body. A very good Sierra Foothills Chardonnay with great minerality. Needed 15 min in the glass to integrate. Drink now. Goes well with …
2018 vintage
Taster #5515
· Feb 28, 2021
85/100
Strange, cloudy, unfamiliar (wouldn't have guessed chardonnay blind). Not bad and definitely had some interest/intrigue for the first couple sips, but very light (lacking in structure) and a little too "crafty" for me.
2018 vintage
Taster #0715
· Oct 23, 2020
89/100
This is a little all over the place. Initially it read like a really generic example of new school CA, lightly reductive, partial malo, low oak, Chardonnay. With time, the basic yellow / green apple & citrus profile expands to bright orange zest, orange blossom and wet stone minerality vibe. There are moments where it becomes really interesting, but it slides mack into a "medium" wine. Medium acid, body, intensity, complexity. It's a little frustrating because it drinks like you're …
2016 vintage
Taster #6516
· Aug 8, 2019
87/100
This is a fantastic QPR Chardonnay that comes in typically $30 or less a lot of places. Made to drink young in my opinion. Great golden color and a really hybrid between new world buttery creaminess and salty salinity. Wish I’d tried it with popcorn! All that said it's not my favorite style Chardonnay. I tend to enjoy more minerally versions.
2016 vintage
Taster #4443
· Feb 17, 2019
87/100
Small glass, brief note. Slightly tropical aromas, a bit more extravagant than I'd prefer. More balanced and restrained flavors are less tropical, showing mostly orchard fruit with good weight and balance.
2016 vintage
Taster #2984
· Jan 19, 2019
82/100
Smakt på Stavanger Vinforum vinmesse 2019 345 NOK
2016 vintage
Taster #6381
· Nov 10, 2018
Full lemon colour. Medium (+) and developing nose with yellow apples, ripe lemon, toast, walnuts, brioche, charred wood and wet stone. Medium (+) taste of yellow apples, ripe lemon, charred wood, toast, brioche, walnuts and wet stone. Long and dry finish. High acidity. Medium body. A very good Californian Chardonnay that is well balanced. Needed half and hour to open. Drink now or over the next couple of years. Goes well with cheeses, fish or shellfish.
2016 vintage
Taster #1287
· Oct 13, 2018
89/100
Much different wine than our last bottle. Makes me wonder if previous bottle was somehow flawed, or just significant variation. Pretty gold. Chardonnay fruit takes center stage. Prefer a little more acidity however.
2016 vintage
Taster #4830
· Sep 17, 2018
88/100
Short note - yellow apples, flint, lemon, well structured, well balanced, very good wine, 88p
2016 vintage
Taster #0936
· Jul 16, 2018
91/100
Pure expression of chardonnay fruit. Unoaked. White Burgundy lovers have been looking for a wine like this from California. Those expecting an oaky, heavily extracted, traditional California Chard will be justifiably disappointed. Good fruit on the palate and enough acidity to provide balance and a nice finish.
2016 vintage
Taster #1078
· Jul 15, 2018
88/100
Sunday blinds (Chicago, IL) : Served double blind. There's a bit of almond on the nose, as well as some golden apples. It's clearly a bit animale and funky, and I pretty much went straight to Vouvray sec. There's a slight touch of sweetness here as well, which is kind of nice. On the other hand, I'd be a little confused if I opened this expecting chardonnay.
2016 vintage
Taster #1287
· May 26, 2018
85/100
Not what I was expecting. Tasting this blind would never have guessed Chardonnay. Quite sweet and not very complex. Not a bad wine, but definitely not what I look for in Chardonnay.
2016 vintage