Pro.mis.Q.ous Red Wine

Light and smooth. Gets stronger as it sits.

Color: deep pitch with dark purple tinge. Little translucency. Nose: bitter fruits, oaks, and chocolate. Flavor: Very astringent forward - think slightly sweet, but overly bitter, under-ripe cranberry - somehow complimented by rich oak, fennel, dark chocolate, and African vanilla bean. Light tannins. The complimentary flavors fall by the middle. The finish remains tart. Linger is 20 or so seconds. Light bodied. Torn between liking and not liking this bottle. Astringency is very prominent, but other flavors counter the astringent …

Smoke and bacon flavor like a Zin but is weak overall, lacks character and body.

Too sweet.

Jammy, hot, and I do not believe this is only 13.5% alcohol. Fruit profile is strawberry, bright overripe red fruit. Drinkable, but borders on unpleasant.

Pro.mis.Q.ous is a decent wine for $10. It is on the sweeter side with a medium body and easy to drink. The CellarTracker community gives it a rating of 84. I give it an 85. Rating Scale: Extraordinary (95-100 points); Outstanding (90-94); Very Good to Excellent (85-89); Good (80-84); Average (75-79); Below average (70-74); Avoid (50-69) Note: Cost reflects base price only; it excludes any taxes and shipping.

This wine is thin. Slightly cloying. Intense purple colour but little flavour. No nose. There are a lot of better wines, even at this price point. Save it for the coq au vin.

Too sweet

I actually don't like red wines because of the little bite most have at the end. This wine gives you a little taste of the bite when you start drinking it, bit finishes off smooth. The wine looks Purple colored. The legs are Slow. It smells like Pomegranate, and Bready. It tastes like and Burnt. The body is Full. The wine has Smooth texture. The wine finishes Long.

Fruit forward, but balances.

Slightly sweet, smooth, and fruity. Would buy it again.

Well, it's going the right direction......up. But certainly not there yet.

Friut forward with molasses and cinnamon on the nose. Cherry and berry fruit up front with a clove nutmeg sweet finish... Alittle bit of a betting after taste... Enough tennis to give it body... For 9 dollars well worth the price. Would recommend for those that like a fruit forward wine with a smooth body and a bit of sweetness.

Decent nose and acidity. Not much on the palate or on the finish. Good tannic structure. Reminds me most of a Merlot (even though this is blend). Definitely drinkable+. Good QPR at the $10-$12 price point.

Fairly tasty - plum light oak Good for price

- Purple color and aromas of oak, molasses and blackberry. It's somewhat balanced and has flavours of oak, molasses and blackberry with a light/medium body. Smooth texture with a medium finish.

Must in the nose. A bit like shoe polish. Raspberry seed. Cherry. Cedar. Sharp on the front.

A wine making travesty.

Rather flavorless. Not great but drinkable.

Retailer tasting, quick notes. Sweet cherry pie on the nose, as well as a bit of mint, and a load of clove, cinnamon, and nutmeg spice. It literally smelt like I smashed my face into a Christmas fruit cake. Very fruit forward on the palate, sweet ripe dark fruits, dried fruits, and spice. Medium finish, somewhat disjointed. Not my style that's for sure.

Great as ever $10 bottle!

Bland Kool-Aid masquerading as wine. $9.99 OH Retail

Jammy and fruity but not overbearing. Great for American palate and cheap crowd pleaser. Good value for what it is.

not bad,

This Table Wine is a blend of Zinfandel, Merlot, Cabernet Sauvignon, and Petite Sirah from Santa Rosa, CA. So it's very dark in color. Aromas have a very herbaceous quality to it. The more it opens up the fruit starts to come out a little more. Detected some plum, and dried fruit. The smell really reminds me of a box of Sun-Maid raisins. You remember that tiny red box of raisins slipped into your school lunch bag that were always …

Are you sure?

Pro.mis.Q.ous Red Wine

Vintages

No vintages

Community Reviews