Critics Average score from professional wine critics and publications.
87
/100
Reviews
10
professional
Vintages
1
2010
Other
87/100
Red Bordeaux Blend
NV
Community Reviews
1111
Reviews
86.9
Avg Score
90
Highest
Taster #2986
· Jan 9, 2023
85/100
I cellared too long but still a decent drink. The tannins are basically gone. Fruit forward but no staying finish. May improve with more decanting.
2010 vintage
Taster #2986
· Dec 30, 2020
85/100
Maybe with some decanting it’ll take on some character.
2010 vintage
Taster #2986
· Mar 28, 2019
82/100
Not a lot of character.
2010 vintage
Taster #7281
· Nov 2, 2015
Consistent w/prior notes
2010 vintage
Taster #7541
· Oct 30, 2014
88/100
Substantial bottle with deep punt hints at quality. Poured directly into sealed carafe with large base and dimple. Tasting from wide mouth bowl. Garnet with purple tones. Semi translucent. 5 minutes: Nose opens with fruit and a touch of old world. Moves to tar and some smoke, add bell pepper that lasts only a few moments. Palate shows dark berries and currents with some astringency 15 minutes: Nose becoming more Bordeaux-ish. More amalgamated. Palate sweetens and hints at menthol. 45 …
2010 vintage
Taster #6320
· Mar 16, 2014
87/100
Dark ink, Medium finish good weekday quaffer. Used it with a pot roast recipe and drank the rest with meal.
2010 vintage
Taster #9656
· Jan 19, 2014
90/100
Decanted about an hour and wine really opened up. Pleasant red berry nose with black & red fruit flavors. Enough tannin to give it good structure and balance. Drinking quite nice now.
2010 vintage
Taster #8080
· Nov 14, 2013
87/100
Color: medium ruby -> medium ruby rim. Fairly nondescript nose of vanilla, oak, berry fruit. Palate came across as fruit forward and not particularly complex. Moderately tannic and good acid level though. Would certainly be adequate for a nonexpensive restaurant wine but looking for something more impressive for home consumption. Of course, at $17, it didn't break the bank to give it a try. Hoping for more, but shouldn't have been surprised by what was in the bottle.
2010 vintage
Taster #9889
· Oct 13, 2013
89/100
I have to admit that this is very tasty....and fair to say that it's well made. But it's a wallop of fruit with a lot of oak. The oak would probably be over the top for some, but I'll chalk this up to a guilty pleasure for now.
2010 vintage
Taster #7541
· Aug 24, 2013
88/100
Havens delivers solid wine all the time. They are one the best values for the dollar around. This wine is fruit forward, which we like, but has interest and depth, and a twinge of that Napa thing. For $17 Bonnie and I think it's a terrific buy. As we've said before, we will buy Havens based on name alone, and this Meritage is another example of why that remains true.
2010 vintage
Taster #6667
· May 8, 2013
88/100
Tough call here -- big, fruity red, with a nice whiff of oak and vanilla on the pop. It's mouth-filling, soft, and pleasurable, but there's not much else. It's one of those guilty pleasure wines. At $18 from WTSO, the price is very fair, but would be much better under $15. The problem is, there are no Napas like that any longer! Update: day 3, very little change after re-corking on day 1. Fruit still most prominent, with sweet vanilla …
2010 vintage